sometimes i wonder why people so incredibly dense are in USP. note that i'm saying dense out of politeness, because i actually mean stupid. and annoying.
it doesn't actually help any person's writing when you agree with other people's critiques of it and paraphrase what they said to substantiate your own insubstantial non-critique.
what i said a. -> i think this is not good because xXx. b. -> yes i agree with a, because XxX. c. -> i also think so. it should not be XXx. d. -> yes, i agree with the previous people. you should not write xxX.
much gratitute to the first person a for pointing out my carelessness of omission (of certain data). the rest of you, get a life, most posts doesn't mean higher grades.
another of my unchanging short-comings, stubbornness. i would rather slog through 20 texts and my own thoughts about the authors, about the topics, about the essay requirements, rather than ask for help.
now i understand why. i have to waste more time sorting through irrelevance.
which does not apply to all well-meaning help so graciously provided to my humble self, of course. i found many of pooja and eunice's comments helpful, among many other people's.
